top of page
Aug 24
3 min read

Updated: Aug 26

Knowledge Hub › Testing & Measurement

TESTING & MEASUREMENT

Multi-Compartment and Multi-Temperature ATP Equipment: Design, Testing and Approval

Understand the additional engineering challenges of ATP multi-compartment and multi-temperature equipment, from reinforced insulation and dividing walls to remaining refrigerating capacity and airflow.

25 August 2026 · Testing & Measurement

Temperature-controlled storage environment representing multi-compartment and multi-temperature ATP equipment.

KEY TAKEAWAY

Multi-temperature equipment cannot be assessed as several independent small boxes. The outer body, internal partitions, refrigeration unit, evaporators and simultaneous compartment loads form one coupled thermal system.

IN THIS GUIDE

1. What makes multi-temperature equipment different

Multi-compartment equipment divides one insulated body into separate cargo spaces that may operate at different temperatures. Heat can enter from ambient conditions and can also move between compartments.

The refrigeration system must therefore manage simultaneous and interacting thermal demands.

The warm compartment can become a heat source for the frozen compartment.

2. The outer body requires reinforced performance

ATP multi-temperature dimensioning uses a reinforced outer-body basis. The Handbook describes an outer-body K-value of 0.40 W/m²·K or less for the multi-compartment equipment covered by the procedure.

This controls external heat gain before the additional complexity of internal partitions is considered.

3. Dividing walls have their own thermal role

Internal partitions separate compartments operating at different temperatures and create additional heat-transfer paths. Their area and thermal properties therefore enter the dimensioning process.

Partition design should also maintain durability and sealing under repeated operational use.

4. Capacity demand is calculated by compartment

Each compartment has a thermal demand based on its external and internal heat-transfer paths and the most unfavourable operating condition relevant to the calculation.

The design should not assume that total refrigeration-unit capacity can be distributed arbitrarily among compartments.

5. The 1.75 capacity factor remains central

The ATP Handbook describes the nominal refrigerating capacity of the multi-temperature unit as at least the heat loss through the outer body multiplied by 1.75. It also applies the 1.75 factor to the relevant compartment-demand checks for remaining effective capacity.

This reserve principle makes simultaneous-performance verification more demanding than simply summing catalogue capacities.

For multi-temperature equipment, total capacity and usable remaining capacity at each evaporator are both important.

6. Remaining effective capacity matters

When one compartment is controlled at a different temperature, the capacity available to another evaporator can change. ATP procedures therefore address remaining effective refrigerating capacity in multi-temperature operation.

This is one reason a mono-temperature unit capacity result cannot automatically justify a multi-temperature configuration.

7. Airflow and control strategy are part of the system

Evaporator position, return-air paths, partitions, fans, defrost and control logic influence whether each compartment can maintain its target condition.

Control interactions should be evaluated under simultaneous operating cases rather than one compartment at a time only.

8. Build the approval evidence before final design freeze

Multi-temperature approval benefits from early modelling and configuration control.

  • Define each compartment geometry and required temperature class.

  • Establish outer-body and partition thermal properties.

  • Calculate worst-case compartment heat loads.

  • Verify nominal and remaining effective refrigerating capacity.

  • Check evaporator and airflow arrangement.

  • Freeze unit, partition and control configuration for evidence generation.

  • Retain the dimensioning and conformity documentation with the ATP file.

Engineering perspective

Multi-temperature projects should be treated as thermal-system integration. A compartment-by-compartment heat-balance model, tied to tested unit performance and controlled geometry, is the best foundation for a smooth ATP approval path.

Primary references

The ATP Agreement and its Annexes are the primary legal reference. Handbook comments support interpretation and harmonization but are not legally binding on Contracting Parties.

Related Technical Guides

Need technical guidance?

ATP Compliance provides independent engineering guidance on ATP classification, testing strategy, technical evidence and compliance readiness for temperature-controlled transport equipment.

ATP Compliance is an independent technical information and advisory platform and is not affiliated with UNECE, national competent authorities or official ATP test stations.

 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
IN THIS GUIDE
Article sections and navigation are available within the guide below.
EXPLORE ATP TOPICS

Article sections and navigation are available within the guide below.

IN THIS GUIDE
EXPLORE ATP TOPICS
AT A GLANCE
Technical Focus
UNECE ATP compliance
Audience
Manufacturers & engineering teams
Guide Type
Independent technical guidance
QUICK ACCESS
Need technical guidance?
Independent support for ATP compliance, testing readiness and technical interpretation.
bottom of page